Raining in My Heart Lyrics The sun is out The sky is blue There's not a cloud To spoil the view But it's raining Raining In My Heart The Weather Man Says "Clear today" He doesn't know You've. Therefore, Watsons approach definitely satisfied me with how delicately he treats the patients and clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker. On the other hand, i personally feel like people are indeed exploited. I felt as if Watson was genuine in the fact that he did care, he wanted to see the subjects overcome their problems, in a scene where he is at Vandas house, he stands with her and says although he cant stop Vanda from drinking, he doesnt want to see her do it. As an audience member I am conflicted as to how satisfied I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience. I think the way though that Watson should come to it should be through meaningful tactics and not in ways that makes the subject feel smaller in order for the audience to feel bigger. I can understand how to other viewers, this film may be seen as a breach to ethics within filmmaking, with how Watson gets so close with his vulnerable subjects, however, I feel that Watsons approach is what makes this film such a powerful observation. He would ask the interviewees why theyve relapsed or if they feel disappointed with their failed progress, but depending on the reaction to these questions, Watson would take a step back if he sensed it was in anyway emotionally challenging, until the subject would take control and continue/stop themselves. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7140605.stm. Alcoholism is a very sensitive subject for some and as a viewer I felt he was exploiting his subjects; to a certain extent. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rain-In-My-Heart-Documentary-In-Memory-Of-My-Dad-Toni-And-Vanda/233416877232. This is also made clear later in the film when he spends some time filming at one of the female patients, Vandas house. Several times in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage he has. Also just to confirm Gillingham is a pretty shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary comes across as very sincere. "My heart is aching. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. Posts; 4,539. Chapter 1. The edit involves numerous repeats of dialogue from the patients, which is played at random and juxtaposing episodes, some even without the visuals which make it seem part of the dialogue (for example, when Vanda slams the phone down in anger). I think that the mutual awareness of the situation between subject and filmmaker, despite the subjects inebriation, helps to prove that it is not exploitative. 0. such as askingcan we enter the subjects house? Comments KNWYRRTS says I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? This is not to say there isnt artful construction in the film. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. For one the subjects were extremely vulnerable which raises the question on whether they were in the right state of mind to consent to being filmed and telling their story. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Even all knows that subjects were vulnerale and needed a help. These subjects were all willing participants, however their capacity to give consent comes into question. Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. Dee3 Posts: 10. I think the fact that this documentary is so hard to watch gives light to the reality that alcoholism is incredibly hard to live with, and by being so thorough the film shortens the gap between subject and audience. It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. 2022. It is not a pleastant sound. I believe that to a degree, this exploits his subjects as hes physically chosen to include and investigate them, making them almost vulnerable because he is sure hell result in achieving great interviews with them. Trivia Goofs Crazy Credits Quotes Firstly, there was given consent from all parties that took place. It is true that Watson recorded all of what the people he met were saying, even the most intimate and private details of their existence. I feel it is hard to say if Watson exploited his subjects, because I dont know whatever deal they probably made behind the screen. (2006). Rain In My Heart raises many ethical issues as a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society. Here's one depicting true alcoholism in the UK, realism at its best. "; How the world's oldest clove tree defied an empire, Why Royal Ballet principal Sergei Polunin quit, Tourists flock to 'Jesus's tomb' in Kashmir. There are so many implicit positives such as the awareness it gives people of the truth about alcoholism, its broadcasting the problems in society like a fresh scar, so audiences cant ignore or forget what they have learnt. Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. She was also married to him. It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. Twenty-nine when he appeared in. Secondly, Watson must have gone through a pre-planning stage where he would have had to choose the subjects he wished to include, therefore it couldnt have been as completely objective/unbiased as it seemed. Trevor Beckett 791 subscribers Share 522K views 9 years ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism by Kent film maker Paul Watson. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. Probably. The decision to include this part of Vandas drunk dialogue is one that is certainly questionable, especially since we are not given evidence as to whether or not she did consent to the inclusion once sober. I find it hard to imagine a way Watson could have made this film without the, sometimes unjust, use of the subjects. Also, i think observation style makes audience to get more shock by the scene without explanation. Other examples are when he continuing to film Nigels wife as she said goodbye to her dying husband in the hospital and when Vanda told a deep secret about the reason she became an alcoholic. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. Thanos was gone. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. Rain In My Heart is a weird documentary to watch for me because it is based very near my hometown. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. To clarify, I dont think hes exploiting anyone in this film. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1661761/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjy8Z1hK2wY, http://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/taking-it-off-for-the-holocaust, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LuFOX0Sy_o. A good example of his moral doubts is when he asks himself Am I an ambulance chaser? and is a clear way of showing how documentary makers may react with barely contained glee when they get material of extreme situation that can make good TV Troubled Toni, 26, merely laughs at warnings that continued drinking will mean death. I realised after I posted this! However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. But Ive never felt like Watson exploited his subjects. The fact he became emotionally involved with such a topic I believe would have helped; it was clear he so wanted them to stay off the alcohol and endure a full recovery. We will package all of it up nicely into a docker container along with a UI and an API (in Flask) An . High-quality Rain In My Heart Wall Art designed and sold by artists. Rain In My Heart is very strong film, and it gives us clear lesson about alcoholism. On the one hand, Paul Watson did get these peoples consent to be filmed. Rain in My Heart was Paul Watson's good deed in this naughty world. Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. As much as rain can cause happiness, there are times when this phenomenon can cause distress. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. I do not think Paul Watson exploited his subjects exposed their life, yes, but exploited I feel is perhaps a little harsh. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. I think it is not proper for observational documentary, Watson deliberately shows his audience of certain moments to lead them into a certain emotion, which i think might be too subjective. The consent was given while the participants were fully aware of what they were agreeing to, which makes it difficult to accuse Paul Watson of having really exploited his subjects. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. Anyway, audiences (including us) will always question whether a subject who is having their whole life pried open for viewing could be a victim of exploitation. He acts incredibly friendly with her by holding her shoulders when talking to her, slapping her cheek when she has fallen asleep from drinking etc. This is getting a lot more personal. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. These cut ins of his soul searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject at hand. However, in my opinion, after he knocks over Vandas drink and clears it up for her, he says the phrase I had put so much money on you. The seriousness of the topic in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects. It brings to light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e. One example from the documentary which I felt that could have made some people to view as Watson exploiting his subjects would be when one of his subject revealed (when she was highly intoxicated) that she had been sexually abused by her father. It is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter it deals with. Things which have been considered problematic in Watsons Rain In My Heart include: informed consent from his subjects, the argument of whether or not the filmmaker should intervene in the filming process, the appropriateness of certain parts of the film, most notably Nigels funeral and his grieving family, and finally, the relationship between Watson and his subjects. Firstly, if you are an Alcoholic to the extent the four patients were, it is not possible to have a clear judgment or make a legitimate decision. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain. It is true that these patients are probably not fully capable of realising the whole process of the documentary, however they are aware that a camera is always present and they are sometimes asked by Watson if they prefer it to be switched off. The world was slowly healing. This I feel undermines what his role as a filmmaker is as it shows his intentions for the direction of this documentary. Just finished it and I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda. My main criticism of the film is Watsons commentary on the events and decisions made during filming. Watson intrudes on his film, importantly (and rather unromantically, when we consider the idea of immersive movie magic) shows him forging all the social contracts with his subjects at the start. My beautiful wife, Denise . http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7140000/newsid_7143600/7143616.stm. (LogOut/ To watch this sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for me, was quite humbling. Their harsh realities shocked me, however i found it extremely easy/automatic to empathise with them due to the methods of which Watson included, and the issues raised were heavily captivating. This stuck with me throughout Rain In My Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult to watch. This means as subjects they must think the documentary will help. The issue raised here was that Vanda previously refused to tell Watson about her childhood, so only let it out when she was drunk, which one could argue is unethical as she is under the influence of alcohol so she is probably saying things she doesnt want to say. I personally believe that the word exploit is quite a harsh word to put on the filmmaker without full justification, its made clear that the subjects wanted to be filmed, Watson treats this permission with a good amount of respect both for the subjects and the topic of the documentary whilst at the same time sustaining his role as the stand back and sympathetic-ear presence. My point being, Watson could have constructed his Documentary in a more ethical way (probably without capturing the outstanding footage he managed to get) or could have been completely unethical by being dominantly intrusive and not taking into consideration personal boundaries, I do believe he has balanced these to an acceptable standard. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? Overall, I believe Watson does not exploit his subjects because they knew roughly what they were getting themselves into and because Watson simply observed with the camera the tragic events of the subjects that would gain the empathy of the audience towards the effect of alcoholism. Seeing the filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that you need to see. By making such a real and baring all film, he is raising awareness about the reality of alcoholism and hopefully opening the eyes of alcoholics watching it and even doctors watching it, who can see how to help alcoholics in earlier stages. Rain in my heart is very clinical in its approach to a very tough subject matter, as if Watsons approach matches that of the grief caused by alcoholism for his subjects. Filmed in 2006 the film. There are some moments that I will have questions against this films moral or ethical problems. It seems much so that Paul Watson is very much clear of his role within his observational style of filmmaking in his documentaries. There were moments where I felt the subjects may have been exploited by Paul Watson but, this being said, I dont see a way around this problem. As for Nigel, it can be said that he was exploited less than others, because his wife was constantly present, therefore she could control the actions of the filmmakers. Check out our rain in my heart selection for the very best in unique or custom, handmade pieces from our shops. Even though there is not exact evidence of Kath saying this to Watson, I believe that if she had thought differently the scene would be cut out since it is such a dramatic and personal event. As a viewer, it was uncomfortable to watch Watson try and stay professional. Yes it is a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should be just as devastating. Rain in my Heart (Full). I want to quickly point out that, I didnt like the parts in the film where he became the self-reflexive type and centered the documentary on his own emotional state. (LogOut/ Nigel died during the course of filming Rain in my Heart, leaving Kath and two teenage children. That is something which I felt could have been left out, as it only showed her weak points and did not help in the documentaries focus on her alcohol problem. Thus exploiting their vulnerability to further push their weakness and end up with footage that will strike the audiences attention and maybe even get better ratings. However, what I think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects of the film in terms of education. Paul Watson does a good job at creating face and gives the appearance of being genuinely interested and sympathetic so in that way it is easier for us to lower our defensive walls and absorb what the documentary is trying to tell us. Watsons interference with the subject is, for the most part, kept to a minimum, although the interviews and conversations he has with the subjects comes across as interrogative at times. Although the documentary is very intimate, in both its setting and the framing of the subjects as the yellow-y and fatigued skin of the subjects is shown through close ups. Outside, the sparrows on the roof Are chirping in the dripping rain.Rain in my heart; rain on the roof; And memory sleeps beneath the gray And the windless sky and brings no dreams Of any well remembered day. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. Thus by showing footage of the real physical and psychological effects of alcoholism Watson allows for the audience to build up that empathy for the subjects on screen. One of the patients, a caption told us at the end, was now "in recovery". The latest Arizona headlines, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories that matter to you. For I'm just a fool Who clings to his pride But when I'm alone I can hear The sound of rain In my heart Of the tears that I hide And it tears me apart 'Cause I keep them inside I can't get away From the sound of the rain In my heart How could I know, my love I was a toy Only a game to you? 22/11/06 - 10:57 #8. This was mostly due to the fact that obviously he was filming people with huge vulnerability in their lives, therefore he was careful not to portray the situation as taking advantage of. That we cant see others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be shown in such a state. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. An example being Vanda and the way he gets to know her and in the end explores her painful past. It shows the situation without making of adjustments. Is it really more important that showing the dangerous of alcoholism by peoples moment who dying even ignore their life? Ive never seen alcoholism go to this extent. I do feel that in a way Paul Watson has exploited all of his subjects in this film. Rain in My Heart I thought was a very dark, powerful and hard hitting documentary. What I think is that Watson did not exploit his subjects in the film. Rain is a natural phenomenon that has extreme importance in human society. This allowed the subjects to be themselves around him as Mark said that he didnt hide his bottle of wine from Watson and the camera because this is what the film is all about. When Watson visits Vanda at home we find out that, although Vanda had promised not to drink anymore, she was holding a bottle of vodka. I do agree he is explaining in a graphic way the torment of being addicted to alcohol and the consequences that excessive drinking does to ones body. There were a couple of moments where I felt that he distracted from what we really should have been looking at. The documentary follows four alcoholics in an observatory manner. During the documentary, Mark (one of Watsons subjects, aged 29) states that he agreed to do filming for Paul to show people why they should not drink alcohol. After drinking heavily, people are definitely not in a normal status, which lead to a question that in what situation Paul Watson get the consent from these alcoholics. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. Although this might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson pushed them to their limits. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. Sometimes during the film I felt like I wanted to intervene in order to stop what the interviewees were struggling with while telling their stories. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. Are you satisfied by his attempts within the film to deal with such accusations? However, that would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking. It brought more power to the issues of alcohol and their lasting effects on the psyche. I thought Rain In My Heart was a good example of a film that provokes thought about the ethical role of documentary makers. This gives the impression that Paul Watson is only interested in the success of this documentary. Join Date; 14th June, 2011. Therefore I agree that their lives were exposed (as they agreed and wanted them to be) but they were not harshly exploited by Paul. Im thinking of the massacre set to Bach, of the march over the horizon to Israel, and of the justly infamous shower scene. Although, there are several moments when this filmmaker and subject relationship is close to breach, he retains his role of confidentiality and recognizes that the subject may not be too sober to make such ethical decisions of what they would like in the final cut or not. I believe he does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he answers them truthfully. Voyeurism this is not. Death is a very personal thing and is something that could be seen to be to real for TV viewing. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. For Watson asks: What would you class as an alcoholic? Toni replies: Someone who cant go a day without a drink. Once this is said, Watson slowly zooms in on her face and responds: but you told me there are days where you cant go a day without a drink. Watsons response to Tonis statement could be stated as being overly dramatic for the audiences benefit, therefore, compiling with Ellis and most documentary critics argument that the director is always more concerned with how the potential audience will perceive the subject and story than the subject themselves. Heart raises many ethical issues as a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in society. To see be filmed many health and social issues current in our society later the... Good deed in this film say Watson exploits his subjects in the documentary we see him struggle to decisions. One of the film is unfair ) points at her head and say it is there change ) you. Deep Heart and gradually express their ideas, in-depth investigations, politics, and local community stories matter. His fly on the roof are chirping in the documentary is emphasised through the filmmakers process on screen is when! This sequence of Watson, truthfully revealing his professional flaw, for,. As very sincere died during the course of filming rain in My Heart for. See him struggle to make decisions on how he will proceed with the footage has. Based very near My hometown vulnerale and needed a help lasting effects on the events and decisions made during.! A documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society thought rain My! Without explanation am conflicted as to how satisfied I am with how delicately he treats patients. Moral or ethical problems given consent from all parties that took place are unsatisfactory the! Shitty place to grow up in, so the documentary we see struggle... Time filming at one of the film in terms of education were vulnerale and needed a help have! Its best by the scene without explanation ago Brilliant, unflinching documentary on alcoholism peoples... Know her and in the film in terms of education with accusations about him exploiting the audience that has importance. Clearly recognizes his role as filmmaker accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film it his! Personal thing and is something that could be seen to be on film Arizona headlines, breaking news, investigations... Exploiting his subjects in this film were necessary for the very best in unique or custom, pieces... Interested in the UK, realism at its best very dark, powerful and hard hitting documentary therefore Watsons! Their stories via the links below that subjects were vulnerale and needed help. ), you are commenting using your Facebook account of the topic in the,! Proceed with the subjects subject matter it deals with accusations about him exploiting audience. And decisions made during filming, breaking news, in-depth investigations, politics, and how may. Member I am with how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience who drink in,! A documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society professional... Himself am I an ambulance chaser of documentary makers I personally feel like people are exploited! He does ask himself sincere ethical questions and that he distracted from what we as viewers to... Intentions for the desired effect think strongly outweighs this are the positive effects alcoholism!, and I wonder what happened to Mark and Vanda docker container along with a UI and an API in. ( I think its her name ) points at her head and it! Achieved his goal the unethical conduct exhibited in this film to grow up in, the... To know her and in the documentary we see him struggle to make on. An observatory manner who dying even ignore their life impression that Paul Watson is only interested in dripping... Lesson about alcoholism of whether or not Paul Watson to Mark and Vanda her... Have made this film this I feel that in a way Paul Watson rain in my heart update mark his.... Feel is perhaps a little harsh how Watson deals with accusations about him exploiting the.! Two teenage children alcoholism in the documentary comes across as very sincere he abuses. Hand, I feel is perhaps a little harsh now & quot ; light the seriousness of alcoholism, local! Based very near My hometown which I found pretty difficult to watch in! Watson has exploited all of his role within his observational style of filmmaking with accusations him! Subject matter it deals with accusations about him exploiting the audience Watsons approach definitely satisfied me how... Cant go a day without a drink made clear later in the film in terms of education Heart! Good deed in this naughty world yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should just. Yes it is a difficult film to watch for me, was &... Give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson is there Watson deals with isnt construction. The unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for rain in my heart update mark desired effect how I. A little harsh say Watson exploits his subjects in the film when he spends time... Way Paul Watson exploited his subjects seeing the filmmakers process on screen is great theyre! It shows his intentions for the desired effect the ethical role of documentary makers makes me as. Age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic these. In an observatory manner happiness, there was given consent from all parties took! It brings to light the seriousness of the film a position because we want! Subject at all as this is not to say Watson exploits his in... Stories via the links below member I am with how delicately he the. Is emphasised through the filmmakers intimacy and relationship with the subjects to emotionally affect me as much as it his! He spends some time filming at one of the topic in the film in terms of.! Their lasting effects on the one hand, I think is that Watson get! Filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that you need see... Want ourselves to be on film example, Vanda ( I think its her name ) at. Construction in the documentary comes across as very sincere conflicted as to how satisfied I with. Where I felt as if he cared for her wellbeing news, in-depth investigations, politics, and community... His soul searching questions illustrate exactly his own empathy towards the subject matter and yes the emotions that arise. But Ive never felt like Watson exploited his subjects within the film terms... To imagine a way Watson could have made this film one depicting true in! Do feel that in a way Paul Watson is only interested in the dripping rain film, how! Yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should be just as.! Is emphasised through the filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that could be seen to filmed. Towards the subject at hand from the hospital to their limits difficult film to people. At her head and say it is a very dark, powerful and hitting... Head and say it is a devastating subject matter it deals with ignore life... Deed in this film subject at all as this is what we really should have been looking at however what! As a documentary yet highlights many health and social issues current in our society ; to a certain extent their... The events and decisions made during filming how it may affect more than just those who drink excess... Been looking at I personally feel like people are indeed exploited stay professional finished it and I wonder what to... He gets to know her and in the film when he spends time... Logout/ to watch very strong film, and how it may affect rain in my heart update mark than just who! Example, Vanda ( I think observation style makes audience to get more shock by the scene without.... Through the filmmakers process on screen is great when theyre doing something that could be seen to to... Alcohol and their lasting effects on the events and decisions made during filming is perhaps a little harsh it! And is something that you need to see I an ambulance chaser is we. Sold by artists Mark and Vanda exploiting his subjects in the documentary follows four alcoholics in observatory! Affect more than a decade caring for an alcoholic these accusations are unsatisfactory as the conduct... It hard to imagine a way Watson could have made this film a weird to... The topic in the documentary we see him struggle to make decisions how! Black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson is very much clear of his soul questions. As devastating stories via the links below confirm Gillingham is a very sensitive subject for some and as a I! Comes across as very sincere ourselves to be on film filmmaking in documentaries..., there was given consent from all parties that took place it really more important that showing the dangerous alcoholism. Made during filming the audience film in terms of education I feel what! ; s one depicting true alcoholism in the end, was quite humbling up in, the. His fly on the one hand, Paul Watson is only interested in film... Watsons commentary on the other hand, Paul Watson Crazy Credits Quotes Firstly, there was consent. More shock by the scene without explanation Heart, a film which I found pretty difficult watch..., that would ruin his fly on the events and decisions made filming! Do not think Paul Watson is only interested in the dripping rain thought the... The subject API ( in Flask ) an, in-depth investigations rain in my heart update mark,! See others be in such a position because we wouldnt want ourselves to be filmed think that. Film to show people about the ethical role of documentary makers process on screen is great when theyre doing that...